No. 24-348
Pamela D. Sutherland v. DCC Litigation Facility, Inc.
Response Waived
Tags: bankruptcy-settlement breast-implant-claims constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection payment-dispute
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2024-11-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Was a Jury Trial Properly Denied Petitioner, and What Could a Jury Decide?
A. Did Dow pay $3.2 Billion, as it agreed to pay?
B. Should Dow be discharged in Bankruptcy, if it did not pay $3.2 Billion?
C. Did the Opt-out Plaintiff get a chance to prove injury from Breast Implants?
D. If Dow delayed payment for 30 years, can Plaintiff prove Dow paid nothing but Investment-interest?
E. Are there Constitutional 14th Amendment issues of "due process" and "equal protection, plus 5th Amendment "taking"?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a bankruptcy settlement involving Dow's $3.2 billion payment for breast implant claims violates due process and constitutional protections
Docket Entries
2024-11-18
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-10-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2024.
2024-10-01
Waiver of right of respondent DCC Litigation Facility, Inc to respond filed.
2024-09-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 28, 2024)
Attorneys
DCC Litigation Facility, Inc
Christian Charles Huffman — Garan Lucow Miller, P.C., Respondent
Pamela Sutherland
James L Elsman Jr. — Elsman Law Firm, Petitioner