No. 24-34
Ricky-Dean Horton v. PG&E Corporation
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 9th-circuit bankruptcy-court bankruptcy-procedure civil-procedure court-rules due-process judicial-discretion procedural-fairness statutory-interpretation substantive-rights
Latest Conference:
2024-11-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the proceedings in the U. S. Bankruptcy
Court N.D. Cal. failed to follow the rules and procedures for a fair and just determination of Petitioner's case and claim?
2. Whether the U. S, Bankruptcy Court N.D. Cal,
and the U.S. District Court N.D. Cal., and the 9th
Circuit Court used or abused the statutes, rules
or procedures to abridge, enlarge or modify the
substantive rights of Petitioner?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the proceedings in the U. S. Bankruptcy Court N.D. Cal. failed to follow the rules and procedures for a fair and just determination of Petitioner's case and claim?
Docket Entries
2024-11-25
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-10-29
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-25
Waiver of right of respondent PG & E Corporation, et al. to respond filed.
2024-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 12, 2024)
Attorneys
PG & E Corporation, et al.
Thomas B. Rupp — Keller Benvenutti Kim LLP, Respondent
Ricky-Dean Horton
Ricky-Dean Horton — Petitioner