1. When a state 's legislature — to stop its courts
from facilitating child abuse, litigation abuse, and
other forms of domestic violence — enacts mandatory
procedures governing the issuance of custody orders,
does that state 's appellate court, after having
consistently reversed non-complying custody orders,
violate the U.S. Constitution 's Equal Protection
Clause by ignoring — entirely and without
explanation — those same procedures, within an
appeal about a trial court 's repeated, undisputed,
and ongoing violations of those procedures?

2. When a vicitim of domestic violence, in order to
recover prevailing party attorneys ' fees, is
retroactively required to prove their abuser 's
fraudulence, does that same appeallate court violate
the U.S. Constitution 's Due Process Clause by
ignoring — entirely and without explanation — all
relevant evidence of fraud, despite that (laregly-
undisputed) evidence conclusively establishing the
abuser 's extensive fraudulence and criminal perjury?

3. May that court also ignore — entirely and
without explanation — the ethics violations of, and
sanctions requests against, the abuser 's attorneys?

4. When a trial court grants sole custody to a
perpetrator of filmed domestic violence — in a
flagrant violation of the above-referenced state
statute — does it also violate the Due Process Clause
and the First Amendement by explicitly disallowing
the non-abusive parent from presenting custody-
related evidence, by refusing to hold the evidentiary
custody hearings it repeatedly promised to hold, and
by prohibiting all communication between a young
child and her only non-abusive parent?

Whether a state appellate court violates constitutional due process and equal protection by disregarding mandatory custody procedures and evidence of domestic violence in a child custody dispute