No. 24-312
Plotagraph, Inc., et al. v. Lightricks, Ltd.
Response Waived
Tags: alice-doctrine computer-implemented-invention digital-animation patent-eligibility pixel-shifting software-patent
Key Terms:
Patent Trademark Privacy
Patent Trademark Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the claims at issue in the Plotagraph patents are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101, as interpreted in Alice Corporation Pty v. CLS Bank International, 573 U.S. 208 (2014) in view of the claims directed to computer animation as allowed in McRO, Inc. v. Bandai Namco Games America, 837 F.3d 1299 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the claims in the Plotagraph patents are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as interpreted in Alice Corporation and McRO
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-20
Waiver of right of respondent Lightricks, Ltd. to respond filed.
2024-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 21, 2024)
Attorneys
Lightricks, Ltd.
Jonathan Saul Franklin — Norton Rose Fulbright US, LLP, Respondent
Plotagraph, Inc., et al.
David Arthur Walker — Schneider Wallace Cottrell Konecky LLP, Petitioner