No. 24-269
Lydia Olson, et al. v. California, et al.
Tags: constitutional-challenge failure-to-state-claim hypothetical-facts judicial-review pleading-standard rational-basis-review
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a court may dismiss for failure to state a claim a constitutional challenge to a law subject to rational-basis review based on hypothetical facts not pleaded in the complaint?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court may dismiss for failure to state a claim a constitutional challenge to a law subject to rational-basis review based on hypothetical facts not pleaded in the complaint?
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-10-10
Amicus brief of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. submitted.
2024-10-10
Brief amicus curiae of Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc. filed.
2024-10-01
Brief amici curiae of California Employment Law Council, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent California, et al. to respond filed.
2024-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2024)
Attorneys
California Employment Law Council; Chamber of Progress
California, et al.
Samuel Thomas Harbourt — California Department of Justice, Respondent
Lydia Olson, et al.
Theane Evangelis Kapur — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc.