No. 24-268

Housing First Minnesota v. City of Corcoran, Minnesota, et al.

Lower Court: Minnesota
Docketed: 2024-09-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: building-permits koontz-doctrine property-rights takings-clause unconstitutional-conditions user-fees
Latest Conference: 2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether valuation-based building permit fees are exempt from unconstitutional conditions analysis under Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, 570 U.S. 595 (2013).

2. Whether the Cities' building permit fees are "user fees" exempt from the Takings Clause.

3. Whether the lower court properly determined on summary judgment that the Cities' building permit fees are user fees when no court has ruled the Cities' building permit fees valid under Minnesota law requiring proportionality between the fees and the Cities' actual cost of remanded to the trial court for adjudication.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether valuation-based building permit fees are exempt from unconstitutional conditions analysis under Koontz and constitute 'user fees' not subject to the Takings Clause

Docket Entries

2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-18
Waiver of right of respondent Cities of Corcoran and Dayton, Minnesota to respond filed.
2024-09-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2024)

Attorneys

Cities of Corcoran and Dayton, Minnesota
Monte A. MillsGreene Espel PLLP, Respondent
Housing First Minnesota
Bryan James HuntingtonLarkin Hoffman Daly & Lingren Ltd, Petitioner