No. 24-267

John Abdelsayed, et al. v. Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-09-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedRelisted (3)
Tags: circuit-split dismissal-without-prejudice fee-shifting judicial-discretion prevailing-party statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2025-03-07 (distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does a dismissal without prejudice that reestablishes the pre-suit status quo make a defendant the "prevailing party" under 17 U.S.C. §§ 505 and 1203(b)(5)?

2. Is a final judgment of voluntary dismissal without prejudice, entered in response to a plaintiff's request under Rule 41(a)(2), a "judgment that [a plaintiff] finally obtains" for purposes of Rule 68?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a dismissal without prejudice that reestablishes the pre-suit status quo make a defendant the 'prevailing party' under fee-shifting statutes?

Docket Entries

2025-03-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-02-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/7/2025.
2025-02-07
Petition of John Abdelsayed, et al. for rehearing submitted.
2025-02-07
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-16
Reply of John Abdelsayed, et al. submitted.
2024-12-16
2024-12-10
Brief of Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. in opposition submitted.
2024-12-02
Brief of respondent Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. in opposition filed. (Distributed)
2024-11-01
Response Requested. (Due December 2, 2024)
2024-10-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2024.
2024-09-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2024)
2024-07-25
Application (24A91) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until September 5, 2024.
2024-07-23
Application (24A91) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 6, 2024 to October 5, 2024, submitted to Justice Thomas.

Attorneys

Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc.
Daniel DeSouzaCopyCat Legal PLLC, Respondent
John Abdelsayed, et al.
Griffin Clayton KlemaKlema Law, PL, Petitioner