No. 24-231
Rakesh Dhingra v. Charles Esposito, et al.
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-violation fact-finding federal-officials judicial-procedure
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-11-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals err in affirming the civil district court's dismissal of petitioner's civil complaint without the civil court conducting fact-findings, or providing "intelligent" reasoning for appellate court's review?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals err in affirming the civil district court's dismissal of petitioner's civil complaint without conducting fact-findings or providing intelligent reasoning for appellate review?
Docket Entries
2024-11-04
Petition DENIED. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-10-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-08-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 30, 2024)
Attorneys
Rakesh Dhingra
Rakesh Dhingra — Petitioner