1. Whether a court may selectively apply the Rooker-Feldman doctrine to preclude federal subject matter jurisdiction by excluding from consideration a jury verdict that found wrongful conduct by the adverse parties, relevant to the issue of extrinsic fraud in the state court action.

2. Whether a permanent injunction prohibiting an individual from forever engaging in commerce in his chosen occupation is facially unconstitutional and a continuing injury.

Whether a court may selectively apply the Rooker-Feldman doctrine to preclude federal subject matter jurisdiction by excluding from consideration a jury verdict that found wrongful conduct by the adverse parties, relevant to the issue of extrinsic fraud in the state court action