No. 24-170
Jake Delahney Taylor v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: child-pornography circuit-split federal-criminal-law lascivious-exhibition statutory-interpretation visual-depiction
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Do the statutory terms "visual depiction" and "lascivious exhibition" refer to the same, or different things?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the terms 'visual depiction' and 'lascivious exhibition' in 18 U.S.C. Chapter 110 refer to the same or different things in the context of child pornography statutes
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-09-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-09-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 16, 2024)
2024-07-10
Application (24A1) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until August 15, 2024.
2024-07-01
Application (24A1) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 15, 2024 to September 13, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Jake Taylor
Mark William Bennett — Bennett & Bennett, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent