No. 24-163
Jorge Alcarez, et al. v. Akorn, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Tags: None
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the court of appeals "so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings …" (Supreme Court Rule 10(a)) that this Court should exercise its supervisory powers and reverse the Panel's order and remand the case to the district court to determine if the court of appeal's new theory of damages was supported by the evidence and whether the Rule 41(a) voluntary dismissals should be treated as a "final adjudication" under the PSLRA under the circumstances of these cases.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-06
Waiver of Theodore H. Frank of right to respond submitted.
2024-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent Theodore H. Frank to respond filed.
2024-08-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 16, 2024)
Attorneys
Jorge Alcarez, et al.
James Milligan Wilson Jr. — Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, Petitioner
Nadeem Faruqi — Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, Petitioner
Theodore H. Frank
Theodore Harold Frank — Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute, Respondent