No. 24-1319

Sriyantha Benedict Sirimanne, et ux. v. Miguel Garcia

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2025-06-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: admissible-evidence due-process factfinding judicial-review parol-evidence-rule statute-of-frauds
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether a judgment based on inadmissible evidence violates due process.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a judgment based on inadmissible evidence violates due process

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-11
Waiver of right of respondent Miguel A. Garcia to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2025-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 28, 2025)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Miguel A. Garcia
Miguel A. Garcia — Respondent
Sriyantha Benedict Sirimanne, et ux.
Sriyantha Benedict Sirimanne — Petitioner