No. 24-13
Ohio, et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Tags: commerce-clause constitutional-structure environmental-regulation equal-sovereignty federal-government federalism sovereign-power state-equality state-power
Latest Conference:
2024-12-13
(distributed 8 times)
Related Cases:
24-7
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
May Congress pass a law under the Commerce Clause that empowers one State to exercise sovereign power that the law denies to all other States?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May Congress pass a law under the Commerce Clause that empowers one State to exercise sovereign power that the law denies to all other States?
Docket Entries
2024-12-16
Petition DENIED. Justice Thomas would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari.
2024-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2024.
2024-12-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-11-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-11-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2024.
2024-11-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2024.
2024-10-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2024.
2024-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
2024-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-23
Reply of petitioners Ohio, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2024-09-09
Brief of respondent Environmental Protection Agency in opposition filed.
2024-09-09
Waiver of right of respondents Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2024-09-09
Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed.
2024-09-09
Letter from Respondents of Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. submitted.
2024-09-09
Brief of Environmental Protection Agency in opposition submitted.
2024-09-09
Brief of California in opposition submitted.
2024-08-08
Brief amici curiae of Iowa, et al. filed.
2024-08-08
State of Iowa, et al.
2024-08-08
Brief amici curiae of States of Iowa, Idaho, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wyoming filed.
2024-08-07
Brief amici curiae of Specialty Equipment Market Association, et al. filed.
2024-08-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 9, 2024, for all respondents.
2024-08-01
Motion of the Solicitor General to extend the time to file a response from August 8, 2024 to September 9, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-08-01
Motion of EPA for an extension of time submitted.
2024-07-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 9, 2024, for all respondents.
2024-07-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 8, 2024 to September 7, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-07-26
Motion of State of California for an extension of time submitted.
2024-07-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 8, 2024)
Attorneys
EPA
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Ian Michael Fein — Natural Resources Defense Council, Respondent
Ohio, et al.
Michael Jason Hendershot — Ohio Attorney General's Office, Petitioner
Thomas Elliot Gaiser — Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Petitioner
Organizations Committed to Constitutional Government
Specialty Equipment Market Association & Performance Racing, Inc.
State of California
Joshua A. Klein — California Department of Justice, Respondent
States of Iowa, Idaho, New Hampshire, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and Wyoming
Eric Harris Wessan — Iowa Dept. of Justice, Amicus