No. 24-1296
McKenzie County, North Dakota v. United States, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: all-writs-act federal-land judicial-preclusion mineral-royalty property-rights quiet-title-act
Key Terms:
Takings Patent
Takings Patent
Latest Conference:
2025-11-07
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the finality and preclusive effect of prior judgments involving the United States' title to property can be enforced through the All Writs Act or if a separate claim to enforce the judgments must be brought under the Quiet Title Act?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the finality and preclusive effect of prior judgments involving the United States' title to property can be enforced through the All Writs Act or if a separate claim to enforce the judgments must be brought under the Quiet Title Act
Docket Entries
2025-11-10
Petition DENIED.
2025-10-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
2025-10-14
Reply of McKenzie County, North Dakota submitted.
2025-10-14
Reply of petitioner McKenzie County, North Dakota filed. (Distributed)
2025-09-29
Brief of United States, et al. in opposition submitted.
2025-09-29
Brief of respondents United States, et al. in opposition filed.
2025-09-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 29, 2025.
2025-08-29
Motion of United States, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
2025-08-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 29, 2025 to September 29, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-07-30
Response Requested. (Due August 29, 2025)
2025-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-09
Waiver of United States, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2025-06-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2025)
Attorneys
McKenzie County, North Dakota
Danielle Rae Bettencourt — Fairfield & Woods P.C., Petitioner
United States, et al.
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent