No. 24-1289
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Sherida Johnson, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, et al.
Response Waived
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a federal court may certify a Rule 23(b)(3) class when almost no one in the class has suffered—or will suffer—an Article III injury.
2. Whether a federal court may circumvent Article III and Rule 23(b)(3) by characterizing a remote risk of harm as an "overpayment."
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal court may certify a Rule 23(b)(3) class when almost no one in the class has suffered an Article III injury, and whether a federal court may circumvent Article III and Rule 23(b)(3) by characterizing a remote risk of harm as an 'overpayment'
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-01
Waiver of Sherida Johnson, et al. of right to respond submitted.
2025-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent Sherida Johnson, et al. to respond filed.
2025-06-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 17, 2025)
2025-04-08
Application (24A950) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until June 13, 2025.
2025-04-03
Application (24A950) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 14, 2025 to June 13, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Nissan North America, Inc.
Christopher Robert Wray — Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., Petitioner
Sherida Johnson, et al.
Matthew W.H. Wessler — Gupta Wessler LLP, Respondent