1. Does the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution and 28 U.S.C. § 1738 require a court to conduct an independent analysis of whether a judgment is void where a party asserts his fundamental right to due process has been violated?

2. Does the Ninth Circuit's failure to state the correct rule of law and apply this Court's precedents warrant summary reversal where the undisputed facts confirm Menzer's Fourth Amendment right to due process had been violated?

Does the full faith and credit clause and 28 U.S.C. § 1738 require an independent court analysis of a void judgment where due process rights are alleged to be violated?