No. 24-1216

In Re Micron Technology, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2025-05-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-discovery district-court executive-branch national-security protective-order technical-documentation
Key Terms:
Patent TradeSecret
Latest Conference: 2025-06-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does a district court clearly and indisputably err in ordering production of sensitive technical docu-mentation without applying the standards set forth in the parties' protective order and without considering the Executive Branch's national -security interests in the documentation at issue?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a district court clearly and indisputably err in ordering production of sensitive technical documentation without applying the standards set forth in the parties' protective order and without considering the Executive Branch's national-security interests in the documentation at issue?

Docket Entries

2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-04
Waiver of Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd. and Yangtze Memory Technologies, Inc. of right to respond submitted.
Main Document
2025-06-04
Waiver of right of respondents Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd. and Yangtze Memory Technologies, Inc. to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2025-05-27
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due June 30, 2025)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Micron Technology, Inc., et al.
Elizabeth Rose Moulton — Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, Petitioner
Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd. and Yangtze Memory Technologies, Inc.
Gabriel K. Bell — Latham and Watkins LLP, Respondent