No. 24-1184
In Re Grand Jury Investigation
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction attorney-client-privilege discovery-order grand-jury-subpoena perlman-exception third-party-compliance
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether Perlman permits an immediate appeal of orders compelling both the objecting privilegeholder and a disinterested third party to comply with a grand jury subpoena.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Perlman permits an immediate appeal of orders compelling both the objecting privilegeholder and a disinterested third party to comply with a grand jury subpoena
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-08-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-04
Reply of Grand Jury Investigation submitted.
2025-08-04
Reply of petitioner Grand Jury Investigation filed. (Distributed)
2025-07-21
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-07-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-06-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 21, 2025.
2025-06-03
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-06-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 20, 2025 to July 21, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-05-19
Motion Granted.
2025-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
2025-04-10
Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed.
2025-04-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 20, 2025)
Attorneys
Grand Jury Investigation
E. Joshua Rosenkranz — Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent