No. 24-1183
Antonio Lamont Lightfoot v. United States
Tags: categorical-approach circuit-split federal-criminal-law predicate-offense sentencing-enhancement three-strikes-law
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether there is a categorical mis match whe n the elements of the predicate state offense, by their plain language , criminalize conduct outside the enumerated offense, with no further inquiry required or permitted.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a categorical mismatch occurs when the elements of a predicate state offense criminalize conduct outside the enumerated offense under the three-strikes law
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-09-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-08-29
Reply of Antonio Lamont Lightfoot submitted.
2025-08-29
Reply of petitioner Antonio Lamont Lightfoot filed. (Distributed)
2025-08-18
Brief of United States in opposition submitted.
2025-08-18
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2025-07-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 18, 2025.
2025-07-11
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2025-07-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 17, 2025 to August 18, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-06-17
Response Requested. (Due July 17, 2025)
2025-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2025-05-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 18, 2025)
2025-03-05
Application (24A839) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until May 15, 2025.
2025-02-27
Application (24A839) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 16, 2025 to May 15, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Antonio Lamont Lightfoot
Richard A. Simpson — Wiley Rein, LLP, Petitioner
United States
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent