No. 24-116
Daniel A. Madero v. Owen McGuinness
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights due-process fourth-amendment material-fact probable-cause summary-judgment tolan
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Whether the denial of Mr. Madero's appeal to
Respondent's motion for summary judgment was in
error, under this Court's ruling in Tolan , as there
was a genuine dispute of material fact and the
evidence of the nonmovant was not believed.
II. Whether the denial of Mr. Madero's appeal regarding
lack of probable cause at the time of his arrest
violates the Fourth Amendment, and is contradictory
to this Court's findings in Beck and Llaguna .
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the denial of Mr. Madero's appeal to Respondent's motion for summary judgment was in error, under this Court's ruling in Tolan, as there was a genuine dispute of material fact and the evidence of the nonmovant was not believed
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-20
Waiver of right of respondent Owen McGuinness to respond filed.
2024-07-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 3, 2024)
2024-06-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 3, 2024)
2024-06-10
Application (23A1094) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until July 30, 2024.
2024-06-05
Application (23A1094) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 30, 2024 to July 30, 2024, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Daniel A. Madero
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
Owen McGuinness
Matthew David Flores — City of Rockford Department of Law, Respondent