Whether due process is violated by exercising specific personal jurisdiction over a foreign garnishee to execute against an asset that has never been in the United States, based solely on the garnishee's use of a correspondent account in New York, where execution against the foreign asset would threaten the garnishee with catastrophic double liability.

Whether due process is violated by exercising specific personal jurisdiction over a foreign garnishee to execute against an asset that has never been in the United States, based solely on the garnishee's use of a correspondent account in New York, where execution against the foreign asset would threaten the garnishee with catastrophic double liability