No. 24-1150

Clyde O. Carter, Jr. v. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Secretary of Labor, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2025-05-09
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law burden-of-proof employment-retaliation federal-railroad-safety-act judicial-review whistleblower-protection
Latest Conference: 2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

In consideration of Loper Light Enterprises v. Raimondo, 603 U. S. (2024), in a whistleblower complaint is the burden of proof - in the protection provisions of the Federal Railroad Safety Act - a prima facie burden pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 42121(b)(2)(B) (i)(ii)(iii), or preponderance of evidence pursuant to 29 Code of Federal Regulations § 1982.109(a).

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the burden of proof in a Federal Railroad Safety Act whistleblower complaint is prima facie or preponderance of evidence

Docket Entries

2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-09
Waiver of Chavez-DeRemer, Sec. of Labor of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-09
Waiver of right of respondent Chavez-DeRemer, Sec. of Labor to respond filed.
2024-12-23

Attorneys

Chavez-DeRemer, Sec. of Labor
Moez Mansoor KabaHueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent
Chavez-DeRemer, Sec. of Labor, et al.
D. John SauerSolicitor General, Respondent
Clyde O. Carter
Clyde O. Carter Jr. — Petitioner