No. 24-1150
Clyde O. Carter, Jr. v. Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Secretary of Labor, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law burden-of-proof employment-retaliation federal-railroad-safety-act judicial-review whistleblower-protection
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
In consideration of Loper Light Enterprises v. Raimondo, 603 U. S. (2024), in a whistleblower complaint is the burden of proof - in the protection provisions of the Federal Railroad Safety Act - a prima facie burden pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 42121(b)(2)(B) (i)(ii)(iii), or preponderance of evidence pursuant to 29 Code of Federal Regulations § 1982.109(a).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the burden of proof in a Federal Railroad Safety Act whistleblower complaint is prima facie or preponderance of evidence
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-09
Waiver of Chavez-DeRemer, Sec. of Labor of right to respond submitted.
2025-06-09
Waiver of right of respondent Chavez-DeRemer, Sec. of Labor to respond filed.
2024-12-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 9, 2025)
Attorneys
Chavez-DeRemer, Sec. of Labor
Moez Mansoor Kaba — Hueston Hennigan LLP, Respondent
Chavez-DeRemer, Sec. of Labor, et al.
D. John Sauer — Solicitor General, Respondent
Clyde O. Carter
Clyde O. Carter Jr. — Petitioner