No. 24-1141
Patricia Iten, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Howard Iten v. County of Los Angeles, California
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-law contract-impairment contracts-clause covid-19-moratorium foreseeability ninth-circuit
Latest Conference:
2025-05-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a party is barred from stating a claim for relief for violation of the Contracts Clause merely because the party could have foreseen the enactment of the contract-impairing law?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a party is barred from stating a claim for relief for violation of the Contracts Clause merely because the party could have foreseen the enactment of the contract-impairing law?
Docket Entries
2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-05-09
Waiver of right of respondent County of Los Angeles to respond filed.
2025-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 6, 2025)
Attorneys
County of Los Angeles
Edward Laucks Xanders — Greines, Martin, et al., Respondent
Patricia Iten, Personal Representative of the Estate of Howard Iten
Kathryn Daly Valois — Pacific Legal Foundation, Petitioner