1. CONTEMPT FOR THE U.S. SUPREME
COURT. Here are the "two forearms" on the scale
described in Axon Enterprise v. FTC, No. 21-86.
Washington State courts have reached the extreme
point of defiance where correction is justified.

2. RETRIBUTION AS STATE POLICY
The State shows contempt for unanimous
NRA v Vello, 22-842, by refusing to examine 1*
Amendment rights with the required strict scrutiny
standard of review. Officials are motivated by
animus bolstered by court demotion into a quasisuspect class with further abuse by application of the
absurd.

3. EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW
The State Panel also shows contempt for a long
list of its own precedents. This contempt is
remarkable because it includes decisions that the
sitting justices wrote, including one "vigorously
protecting privacy", McGee, AP-3, written while the
Panel was in the process of denying Flarity a review
to protect domicile privacy. We ask the Supreme
Court to return the "inviolate right to jury trial' to
the citizens of Washington State.

Whether Washington State courts have shown contempt for Supreme Court precedents and constitutional rights through biased judicial proceedings