No. 24-1137
NexStep, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Response Waived
Tags: doctrine-of-equivalents expert-testimony federal-circuit jury-verdict patent-infringement patent-law
Latest Conference:
2025-06-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a patentee must in every case present "particularized testimony and linking argument" to establish infringement under the doctrine of equivalents.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a patentee must in every case present 'particularized testimony and linking argument' to establish infringement under the doctrine of equivalents
Docket Entries
2025-06-16
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
2025-05-22
Waiver of Comcast Cable Communications, LLC of right to respond submitted.
2025-05-22
Waiver of right of respondent Comcast Cable Communications, LLC to respond filed.
2025-04-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 5, 2025)
2025-03-04
Application (24A847) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until May 2, 2025.
2025-02-28
Application (24A847) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 2, 2025 to May 2, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
NexStep, Inc.
Daniel N. Lerman — Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Petitioner