1.Does Colorado 's current expansive interpretation
of C.R.C.P. Rule 107 violate constitutional rights of
non-parties by interpreting the Rule to apply to
anyone living anywhere while disallowing the
defenses of governmental immunity and expanding
contempt to include even legal actions by the non-
party?

2.Does lack of proper service and improper
underlying documents in a foreclosure case deprive
the court of personal and subject matter jurisdiction
ab initio ?

3.Does C.R.C.P. Rule 105 violate substantive and
procedural due process?

4. Does Justice Rice 's decision as Commissioner in
this case violate Petitioner 's due process rights by
excluding her from the partition hearing and
depriving her of her property rights in violation of
her own authored opinions in Colantuno v. A.
Tenenbaum & Company, Inc., 23 P.3d 708 (2001)
and Kerns v. Kerns, 53 P.3d 1157 (Colo. 2002)

Does Colorado's current expansive interpretation of C.R.C.P. Rule 107 violate constitutional rights of non-parties by interpreting the Rule to apply to anyone living anywhere while disallowing the defenses of governmental immunity and expanding contempt to include even legal actions by the nonparty?