No. 24-1112
Rolland G. Shoup, II v. Indiana
Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence-foundation fourteenth-amendment officer-testimony
Latest Conference:
2025-05-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does a state deprive a defendant of their Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law when it admits adverse evidence not on the basis of a proper foundation, but simply on the arresting officer's say-so.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a state deprive a defendant of their Fourteenth Amendment right to due process of law when it admits adverse evidence not on the basis of a proper foundation, but simply on the arresting officer's say-so
Docket Entries
2025-06-02
Petition DENIED.
2025-05-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/29/2025.
2025-05-05
Waiver of right of respondent Indiana to respond filed.
2025-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 28, 2025)
Attorneys
Indiana
James Allen Barta — Office of the Indiana Attorney General, Respondent
Rolland G. Shoup
Michael Jay Bruzzese — Smid Law, LLC, Petitioner