No. 24-1097
Monsanto Company, a Foreign Corporation v. Nancy C. Salas
Relisted (3)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: epa-regulation failure-to-warn fifra-preemption product-liability state-law warning-requirements
Key Terms:
Environmental
Environmental
Latest Conference:
2026-01-16
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether FIFRA preempts a state-law failure-to-warn claim where EPA has repeatedly concluded that the warning is not required and the warning cannot be added to a product without EPA approval.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether FIFRA preempts a state-law failure-to-warn claim where EPA has repeatedly concluded that the warning is not required and the warning cannot be added to a product without EPA approval
Docket Entries
2026-01-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/16/2026.
2025-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/9/2026.
2025-07-23
Reply of Monsanto Company submitted.
2025-07-23
Reply of petitioner Monsanto Company filed.
2025-07-17
Rescheduled.
2025-07-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-06-18
Brief of Nancy C. Salas in opposition submitted.
2025-06-18
Brief of respondent Nancy C. Salas in opposition filed.
2025-05-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 20, 2025.
2025-05-02
Motion of Nancy C. Salas for an extension of time submitted.
2025-05-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 22, 2025 to June 20, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 22, 2025)
Attorneys
Monsanto Company
Paul D. Clement — Clement & Murphy, PLLC, Petitioner
Nancy C. Salas
Stephen F. Rosenthal — Podhurst Orseck, P.A., Respondent