Whether an executive agency contracting officer may eliminate the requirement to exercise discretion by inserting contract language that nullifies the Federal Acquisition Regulation's excusable delay protections in a commercial items contract.

Whether a contracting officer's refusal to consider delivery delays caused by the Suez Canal blockage — an archetypal common carrier delay — violates FAR 52.212-4(f) and exceeds the officer's authority under 41 U.S.C. § 3307.

Whether, under Loper Light Enterprises v. Raimondo, courts must invalidate agency actions that amount to unauthorized legislative rulemaking, including when a contracting officer unilaterally rewrites procurement obligations established by Congress.

Question not identified.