No. 24-107
Ivan To Man Pang v. Anthony Ye, Citi Realty Services, Financial Manager, et al.
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure credibility credibility-challenge evidence-standard genuine-issues-of-material-fact material-fact nonmoving-party summary-judgment
Key Terms:
EmploymentDiscrimina
EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the lower court erred in granting summary judgment by failing to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and resolve all ambiguities in favor of the plaintiff, as required by Davis-Garrett v. Urban Outfitters, Inc., 921 F.3d 30 (2d Cir. 2019).
2. Whether summary judgment is appropriate when the plaintiff presents evidence challenging the credibility of the defendants' testimony, potentially creating genuine issues of material fact that should be resolved by a trier of fact.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
summary-judgment
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2024)
Attorneys
Ivan To Man Pang
Ivan To Man Pang — Petitioner