Wei Qiu v. Board of Education of Bowling Green Independent Schools, Kentucky
Question 1. Should a plaintiffs response to the motion to dismiss be converted to a summary motion when some of the evidence are "the matters outside the pleadings "?
Question 2. Can a Rule 59(e) motion of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure function as a summary motion when setting up prima facie?
Question 3. Can a sanction motion be denied based on other decisions instead of the facts and laws in the sanction motion?
Question 4. Did the judges violate Qiu 's Constitutional right to due process and equal protection of the laws in Section 1 of Amendment XIV? Were the judges against the Rule of Law?
Whether a Rule 59(e) motion can be converted to a summary judgment motion when evidence outside pleadings is presented and whether judicial actions violated due process and equal protection rights