No. 24-1034
Ulysses Charles Sneed v. Terry Raybon, Warden
Tags: certificate-of-appealability circuit-split habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance merits-review sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2025-06-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the court of appeals err in denying petitioner's application for a COA as to his constitutional habeas claims where (i) a circuit judge found that the COA standard had been met and (ii) the court denied a COA based on its ruling on the merits of those claims.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the court of appeals err in denying petitioner's application for a COA as to his constitutional habeas claims where (i) a circuit judge found that the COA standard had been met and (ii) the court denied a COA based on its ruling on the merits of those claims
Docket Entries
2025-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2025-06-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
2025-06-09
Reply of Ulysses Charles Sneed submitted.
2025-06-09
Reply of petitioner Ulysses Charles Sneed filed. (Distributed)
2025-05-27
Brief of Warden in opposition submitted.
2025-05-27
Brief of respondent Terry Raybon, Warden in opposition filed.
2025-04-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 28, 2025.
2025-04-14
Motion of Warden for an extension of time submitted.
2025-04-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 28, 2025 to May 28, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-03-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 28, 2025)
2025-02-12
Application (24A781) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 26, 2025.
2025-02-10
Application (24A781) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 24, 2025 to April 25, 2025, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Ulysses Charles Sneed
James Christopher Martin — Reed Smith LLP, Petitioner
Warden
Henry Mitchell Johnson — Alabama Atty General, Respondent