No. 24-1027
Invenergy Thermal LLC, et al. v. Casey Sixkiller, Director, Washington State Department of Ecology
Tags: None
Key Terms:
Antitrust JusticiabilityDoctri
Antitrust JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2025-09-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether this Court's decision in General Motors Corp. v. Tracy, 519 U.S. 278 (1997), immunizes State laws affecting utilities from challenge under the dormant Commerce Clause, even when those laws affect competitive markets.
2. Whether alleging interstate and market-wide consequences of a state law, including a protectionist effect, adequately alleges a burden on interstate commerce, as five Justices would have held in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross, 598 U.S. 356 (2023).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Docket Entries
2025-10-06
Petition DENIED.
2025-07-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
2025-07-16
Reply of Invenergy Thermal LLC , et al. submitted.
2025-07-16
Reply of petitioners Invenergy Thermal LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2025-06-30
Brief of Casey Sixkiller in opposition submitted.
2025-06-30
Brief of respondent Casey Sixkiller in opposition filed.
2025-05-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 30, 2025.
2025-05-20
Motion of Casey Sixkiller for an extension of time submitted.
2025-05-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 30, 2025 to June 30, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
2025-04-30
Response Requested. (Due May 30, 2025)
2025-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
2025-04-18
Waiver of Casey Sixkiller of right to respond submitted.
2025-04-18
Waiver of right of respondent Casey Sixkiller to respond filed.
2025-03-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 25, 2025)
Attorneys
Casey Sixkiller
Peter Benjamin Gonick — Attorney General of Washington, Respondent
Invenergy Thermal LLC , et al.
Charles Luther McCloud — Williams & Connolly LLP, Petitioner