Whether the Federal Arbitration Act and this Court's decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana preempt California's interpretation of the Private Attorneys General Act to permit a plaintiff to maintain non-individual PAGA claims in court after her individual PAGA claim has been compelled to arbitration, thereby allowing the plaintiff to establish and maintain statutory standing to pursue representative relief on behalf of other aggrieved employees.

Whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts California's interpretation of the Private Attorneys General Act that allows a plaintiff to maintain non-individual claims in court after their individual claim is compelled to arbitration