Kurt Benshoof v. Freya Brier, et al.
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess FirstAmendment Punishment Jurisdiction JusticiabilityDoctri
1. Whether Respondents must be enjoined from continuing to retaliate
against Applicant for his religious beliefs, and subjecting Applicant to
segregationist discrimination, in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
and the First Amendment.
2. Whether Respondents must be enjoined from continuing to retaliate
against Applicant for exercising his right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness by subjecting Applicant to segregationist discrimination, in
violation of the Fourth Amendment.
3. Whether Respondents must be enjoined from perpetrating concerted,
parallel acts with PCC employees, and City of Seattle police, prosecutors,
and judges, against Applicant's religious beliefs and his life and liberty in
furtherance of the ongoing and threatened imposition of excessive fines, or
cruel and unusual punishments, upon Applicant in violation Eighth
Amendment to the United States Constitution
4. Whether Respondents must be enjoined from perpetrating concerted
parallel acts to violate, and their immediate threat to violate, the Due
Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by maliciously prosecuting
Applicant under color of law.
5. Whether Respondents must be enjoined from perpetrating concerted
parallel acts to violate, and their immediate threat to violate, the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by maliciously
prosecuting Applicant under color of law.
Whether the First, Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual from retaliatory, discriminatory prosecution for refusing to wear a face mask during the COVID-19 pandemic