I.

Whether Illinois Supreme court could endorse a Cook county state lower court abuses
and could abridge/Infringe/encroach the Federal Jurisdiction of an UNOPPOSED,
REMOVED case, by suasponte 'planting the case' in state court calendar after more
than a year , and without any certified remand order, in exchange for bribes paid by a
ruthless, white collar criminal mortgage loan servicing company respondent Ocwen
Loan servicing. [Refer to Group Exhibit 1 of numerous law suits; Fifty State
Attorney General law suits; Law suit by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; a
second law suit by Florida attorney General for breach of Settlement Agreement with
Fifty State Attorney Generals; Cease and Desist order by Illinois Department of
Professional Regulations; numerous law suits by Homeowners, Class action law suits.

II.

Whether Illinois Supreme Court could endorse a Cook county state lower court
abuses and could abridge/Infringe/encroach the Federal Jurisdiction of an
UNOPPOSED, REMOVED case by suasponte 'planting the case' in state court
calendar after more than a year when no motion to remand filed

III.

Whether Illinois Supreme court could endorse a cook county state lower court abuses
and could abridge/Infringe/encroach the Federal Jurisdiction of an UNOPPOSED,
REMOVED case by swasponte "planting the case' in state court calendar after the
state court itself entered orders that the case in "Federal jurisdiction; Acknowledged
UNOPPOSED REMOVAL to Federal Court.

Whether a state supreme court can improperly interfere with federal court jurisdiction by sua sponte remanding a previously removed case without legal basis