No. 23A829

Joseph Daryll Rued, et al. v. Charlene W. Hatcher, Judge, Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-13
Status: Denied
Type: A
Tags: child-welfare constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-review liberty-interest
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

Should emergency writs of injunction pending appeals issue against enforcement of direct Respondents' orders for which due process, already appealed through this Court without adequate relief, has not been provided in seven years of litigation, which fundamentally rely upon admittedly falsified conclusions to child welfare investigations, violate child maltreatment and other statutes, and deprive Applicants' most precious and protected rights and liberty interests, including physical liberty, when underlying constitutional claims, repeatedly presented, are unreached by all lower state and federal judiciaries, causing undue delay and impeding this Court's appellate jurisdiction, due to irreparable harms sustaining such unconstitutional actions causes Applicants?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether due process protections are violated when state child welfare investigations rely on admittedly falsified conclusions to deprive parents of fundamental liberty interests without adequate judicial review

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Application (23A829) denied by the Court.
2024-03-27
Application (23A829) referred to the Court.
2024-03-27
Application DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-14
Application (23A829) refiled and submitted to Justice Thomas.
2024-03-13
Application (23A829) denied by Justice Kavanaugh.
2024-03-04
Application (23A829) for writ of injunction, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Joseph Rued, et al.
Joseph Daryll Rued — Petitioner