This case concerns whether a predatory offender registration scheme that requires the submission of detailed personal information about every aspect of a person's life, where failing to provide the information and keep it up to date and accurate is a felony, impinges on a liberty interest sufficient to trigger the protections of the Due Process Clause.

Whether a state's mandatory sex offender registration scheme that requires extensive personal disclosures and imposes criminal penalties for non-compliance constitutes a deprivation of liberty interests protected by the Due Process Clause