When an agency deadlocks over a decision, and Congress tells courts that a deadlock is agency action that is reviewable in court, should a court faced with that command pick one side of the deadlock and credit the views of those agency members, or should it equally weigh the views that gained an equal share of the vote?

Whether a federal agency's deadlocked vote constitutes final agency action subject to judicial review and, if so, how courts should evaluate and resolve such split decisions under administrative law