No. 23A567
Tug Hill Operating, LLC v. Lastephen Rogers
Tags: None
Key Terms:
Arbitration TradeSecret WageAndHour Privacy ClassAction
Arbitration TradeSecret WageAndHour Privacy ClassAction
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in holding that it, rather than an arbitrator, should decide whether an arbitration agreement is valid and enforceable.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified.
Docket Entries
2024-01-17
Application (23A567) denied by The Chief Justice.
2024-01-08
Reply of applicant Tug Hill Operating, LLC filed.
2024-01-03
Response to application from respondent Lastephen Rogers filed.
2023-12-20
Response to application (23A567) requested by The Chief Justice, due by 4 p.m. (EST), January 3, 2024.
2023-12-15
Application (23A567) for a stay, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Lastephen Rogers
Anthony Joseph Majestro — Powell & Majestro, Respondent
Tug Hill Operating, LLC
John Caviness O'Quinn — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner