1. Is it a violation of substantial rights under procedural due process of law when a district judge at the pretrial stage and subsequent circuit judges on a motion for summary judgment act as triers of fact, contravene Rule 56), ignore motions for relief and this Court's established precedent, displaying conscious bias to a pro se party's entitlement? to summary judgment?

2. Whether a judge's impartiality is questioned when he/she fails to investigate fraud on the court, when the plaintiff is the movant on an undisputed motion for summary judgment', then defendant files a subsequent motion for summary judgment 34 days later and supports it with fabricated evidence that was not in the record at the close of discovery — to which the judge relied on to make its ruling in favor of liable employer.

Whether a federal district court judge violates procedural due process and judicial impartiality by relying on fabricated evidence and displaying bias when ruling on a summary judgment motion in a Title VII employment discrimination case