No. 23A444
David Santiago Renteria v. Texas
Tags: cruel-and-unusual degraded-drugs due-process eighth-amendment execution-protocol lethal-injection
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' rejection of petitioner's Eighth Amendment and Due Process Clause claims—based on uncontested evidence that the Director of Texas's prison system unnecessarily uses compounded pentobarbital that has been left to degrade into non-lethal degradants known to cause pain—conflicts with this Court's holding in Glossip v. Gross that an inmate need only show "a substantial risk of severe pain" rather than prove that an Eighth Amendment violation has already occurred.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eighth Amendment prohibits the use of degraded, unstable lethal injection drugs that pose a substantial risk of causing severe pain during execution
Docket Entries
2023-11-16
Application (23A444) for stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Alito.
2023-11-16
Application (23A444) referred to the Court.
2023-11-16
Application (23A444) for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Attorneys
David Renteria
Tivon Schardl — Federal Defender TXWD CHU, Petitioner