No. 23A411
Irvin Harris Johnson v. United States
Tags: attorney-client-privilege confidential-communication criminal-procedure right-to-counsel sixth-amendment work-product-doctrine
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment protects a criminal defendant's handwritten notes prepared for attorney consultation from being seized and used as evidence at trial, despite not explicitly mentioning counsel
Docket Entries
2023-12-05
Application (23A411) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 12, 2024.
2023-12-01
Application (23A411) to extend further the time from December 15, 2023 to January 12, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2023-11-08
Application (23A411) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 15, 2023.
2023-11-03
Application (23A411) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 15, 2023 to December 15, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Irvin Harris Johnson
Jeffrey T. Green — Northwestern Supreme Court Practicum, Petitioner
Tobias Samuel Loss-Eaton — Sidley Austin LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent