No. 23A386

Marylin Pierre, et al. v. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland

Lower Court: Maryland
Docketed: 2023-10-31
Status: Presumed Complete
Type: A
Tags: actual-malice attorney-discipline first-amendment free-speech judicial-criticism new-york-times-v-sullivan
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

Question not identified.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the First Amendment protects lawyers from disciplinary sanctions for criticizing judges under the actual malice standard established in New York Times v. Sullivan

Docket Entries

2023-11-02
Application (23A386) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 13, 2024.
2023-10-26
Application (23A386) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 14, 2023 to January 13, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Main DocumentLower Court Orders/OpinionsLower Court Orders/OpinionsProof of ServiceOtherMain DocumentLower Court Orders/Opinions

Attorneys

Marylin Pierre, et al.
Irwin Raphael Kramer — Kramer & Connolly, Petitioner