No. 23A335
Tags: due-process-clause evidence-of-innocence fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-counsel post-conviction-relief shinn-v-ramirez
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a state court conviction violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment when photographic evidence of innocence was not presented to the jury due to ineffective assistance of post-conviction relief counsel, and whether Shinn v. Ramirez permits federal review of defaulted claims arising from such ineffective assistance without requiring exhaustion in state court
Docket Entries
2023-10-16
Application (23A335) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until January 8, 2024.
2023-10-02
Application (23A335) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 7, 2023 to January 6, 2024, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Simeon Bozic
Simeon M. Bozic — Petitioner