No. 23A145
Mauricio Gonzalez v. United States
Tags: child-pornography due-process inadmissible-evidence indictment-deficiency notice-requirement sentencing-enhancement
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether an indictment that fails to allege all material elements of the charges violates the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause and the Sixth Amendment's right to notice, and whether a sentencing court may consider extraneous or inadmissible evidence in enhancing a defendant's sentence in violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments
Docket Entries
2023-08-17
Application (23A145) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until November 4, 2023.
2023-08-15
Application (23A145) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 5, 2023 to December 4, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Mauricio Gonzalez
Robert L. Sirianni Jr. — Brownstone, P.A., Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent