No. 23A1176

Sadick Edusei Kissi v. United States

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-02
Status: Presumed Complete
Type: A
Tags: appellate-counsel criminal-justice-act petition-for-certiorari solo-practitioner time-extension workload-constraints
Latest Conference: N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether Article III of the U.S. Constitution precludes federal courts of appeals from issuing "non-precedential" decisions to resolve contested appellate issues, as the Eighth Circuit previously held in Anastasoff v. United States, 223 F.3d 898 (8th Cir. 2000), overruled as moot by Anastasoff v. United States, 235 F.3d 1054 (8th Cir. 2000); and

Whether the right to due process in connection with an appeal is satisfied when a litigant's non-frivolous appellate arguments are disposed of by way of a non-precedential order that overlooks material facts and/or does not explain its legal conclusions.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Criminal Justice Act appointed attorney may be granted an extension of time to file a petition for certiorari due to professional workload constraints

Docket Entries

2024-08-23
Application (23A1176) granted by Justice Sotomayor further extending the time to file until September 19, 2024.
2024-08-13
Application of Sadick Edusei-Kissi for a further extension of time submitted.
2024-08-13
Application (23A1176) to extend further the time from September 4, 2024 to September 19, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
2024-07-03
Application (23A1176) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until September 4, 2024.
2024-06-24
Application (23A1176) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 21, 2024 to September 4, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Sadick Edusei-Kissi
Lucas Arment AndersonRothman. Schneider, Soloway & Stern, LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent