No. 23A1102
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Charles Ramsey
Tags: arbitration-agreement consumer-protection federal-arbitration-act mcgill-rule ninth-circuit public-injunctive-relief
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether California's McGill rule impermissibly disfavors arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act by rendering standard bilateral arbitration agreements unenforceable when a consumer seeks to enjoin allegedly unlawful business practices
Docket Entries
2024-08-05
Application (23A1102) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 27, 2024.
2024-07-26
Application of Comcast Cable Communications, LLC for a further extension of time submitted.
2024-07-26
Application (23A1102) to extend further the time from August 29, 2024 to September 27, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2024-06-11
Application (23A1102) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 29, 2024.
2024-06-07
Application (23A1102) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 30, 2024 to August 29, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Aileen Marie McGrath — Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Petitioner
Pratik Arvind Shah — Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Petitioner