No. 23A1065
Jamie Mills v. John Q. Hamm, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al.
Tags: constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual death-penalty eighth-amendment execution-gurney prolonged-restraint
Key Terms:
Punishment
Punishment
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Eighth Amendment is violated when a condemned prisoner is restrained to an execution gurney for a prolonged period of time without access to counsel or the courts, and without a legitimate penological purpose, in violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether prolonged restraint on an execution gurney without access to counsel constitutes a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment
Docket Entries
2024-05-30
Application (23A1065) referred to the Court.
2024-05-30
Application (23A1065) for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Thomas and by him referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
2024-05-29
Application (23A1065) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Thomas.