The Cobb County Superior Court, State of Georgia
errored in dismissing Petitioner 's discharge tender to
settle and close the mortgage liability at issue in
cause no: 22104715 for the reasons below:

1. Can the identified "Holder " of the Securitized
mortgage debt avoid discharge of said debt when
bonds are issued in accord with Title 48 C.F.R. Ch. 1,
Part 53.228?

2. Can the court dishonor discharge when bonds are
issued in accordance with Title 48 C.F.R. Ch. 1, Part
53.228 by Petitioner (Marcus Marchman) to
discharge the alleged mortgage debt?

3. Can the court ignore the nature of the Bills of
Exchange Act as it applies to discharging securitized
mortgage debt in accord with Title 48 C.F.R. Ch.l,
§53.228?

4. Is it possible to accomplish a quiet title action
without court due process?

5. Can Respondent, who sold the mortgage debt to
third parties, maintain standing to foreclose when
the mortgage debt was discharged in accord with
Title 48 C.F.R. Ch. 1, §53.228?

6. Can a party who is not the securitized mortgage
debt "Holder " perform a foreclosure action, i.e.
"AMERIHOME MORTGAGE CO., Respondent?

7. There exists a question as to whether the conduct
of respondent and the lower court have violated the
U.S. Constitution, Art 1, S8, Cl. 17, Commerce
Clause when blocking the ability to tender bonds
(U.C.C. §2-511) to discharge commercial paper
liabilities in addition to the U.S. Constitution, Art 3,
S2, Cl. 1, Judicial Clause by and through Title 28
U.S.C. §3002 (4) and U.C.C. §1-201(2).

8. Can a "fiscal agent of the United States
[Treasury], " pursuant to Title 12 USC §266, evade
fiduciary banking duty to discharge and block
petitioner 's access to banking in addition to violating
the commerce clause?

9. There exists a question for the court to determine
whether the use of bonds in accord with Title 48 CFR
Ch. 1 §53.228 being dishonored in accord with
U.C.C. §3-503(l)(c) by both respondent and the lower
courts is a proper activity in fight of the fact that
said parties operate within and use bonds in their
everyday business relations through the United
States Treasury, Tax and Loan (TT&L) banking
computer portal system.

10. Can the UNITED STATES and its "fiscal agents
of the United States [Treasury], " (12 USC §266)
violate International Treaty agreement provisions for
The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the
International Sale of Goods (CISG)?

Can the identified 'Holder' of the Securitized mortgage debt avoid discharge of said debt when bonds are issued in accord with Title 48 C.F.R. Ch. 1, Part 53.228?